Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  337 / 808 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 337 / 808 Next Page
Page Background

`TER.

zv.

Ephefaans,

Chap.z.

311

the

Jewes

fo

erroneous, the authority

of

their great Rabbies and tra-

ditionary divinity,

was fo

embraced by them

,

as

Chrìft

faith,

It

is

lid

ofold,

but

I

fay:

So

in

matter

of

rites,

their

ma/hing

of

hands

with figni-

ficatioa,chey

call

it

a

conflicution

of

their

Fathers;

this was in

the Pri-

mitive

Church

continued that many were

fo

addicted to fome men,

that

they

would

receive

thethings

fathered upon them,

though

difcre-

pant from

the

Evangelical] doctrine:

So

that

in

Tertulians time many

did

defend

,

that the Apoftles

did

not write all truth

for

us

to know,

but

that there

was a

more

perfe&

Divinity which

was

traditionary:

yea

in

Irenaus

his

time before

Tertulian,

lib.

z. cap.

23,

24. For

this

is

the property

of

Heretiques to calumniate the

perfet`tion

of

Scripture,

neither

doe

they ever

flye

to

it,

but only

to

the barke

of

the

out-

ward fyllables,

that they

may

fo

avoyd the

fub(tance and

matter

of

it,

which

is

moil

manifeft: and

the authority

of

Antique tradition

is

fo

forcible,

that

it beguiled fome

of

the Fathers

,

drawing them to

ufe

fome

ceremonies utterly ungrounded

in

the

Word,

as

Milke and

Ho.

ny

in

Baptifme,

giving

the

Eucharift to children

,

not

kneeling

from

Fatter

to

Whitfun

-tide. But

how

did

Tertulian

then thew

that tradi-

tions were

not to

be regarded which were befide

the authority

of

the

Word,in

matters

of

faith

and

mannersf Even thus.

The

Apoftles

Nere fent by

Chrift;iftherefore

they

did

not

publith things faithfully,

either

they

were unable or

not

fyncere, and

Chrilt

blame

-

worthy that

would

fend

thofe

fo qualified.

Wee

may fay: either

they

could and

would not: would, but could

not:

or

elfe

were willing

and

able,

but

might not.

That

they

could

not,

is

abfurd, who had

the

gifts

of

the

Holy Ghoft

fo

abundantly.

That

they would not,

is

unlikely ,

who

were

fo

faithful!, and

who

fuffered all

things, yea death

it felfe,

for the

Churches

good. That they

might

not

,

left

holy things

Mould bee

too

much divulged, and

fo Peones call

before

[wise; for Chrift

bidde

them

[peak

all things

they

heard

from

him

(yea though

in

fecret)

upon

houfe

tops:

And

as

for dogs and

fwine

there

is

no feare; for

the

Bible

(though

open)

is a

clafped

book to

them;

as

for

others

,

all

the

coun-

fell

of

God belongethto them.

Be

not then

deceived with things

after the traditions of men.

By

yf

r,

this we difcerne

the

deceived

ettate

of

the Roman

Church;

for one

Be noe

doto-

egge

is

notlikeranother then they to thofe old Heretiques:

and

the

dedw,thtrada-

principall part

of

their

beliefe

and

pralife

hath no better ground then

nano

PaP''

humane

tradition,without the

Word.

Secondly,this

muff

teach

us

not to

Eland

too much

upon

the autho-

2.

rity

of

men,

as

to

pinne faithupon

their opinion.

omnes Patres

tota

Stand nor

too

much

on au-

Schola

, are not

the Old

and

New

Teftament,

we

all incline

to

fpeak

charity

of

as

they,Which ofthe

Rabbits

and Dollars ofthe Law

fay

thus! and

tore.

men.

jeél

that which commeth not

ufbered

in

with humane Teftimonies.

Whereas we

Ihould

not

receive any

thing,bccaufe men

affirme

it, nor

deny

any thing in this

regard limply, becaufe great Clerks are

of

other

judgement , (

though

wee mutt

not

on

the

other

extreame

paffe

lby antiquity and

moderne judgements upon

a

felfe-

willed

fancy,

F

Mat.ç.zr.za.

as