609 / 772
+
That
use
are
iuflified
by
Chrifts
imputed
righteoufeef
.
y
3
or imputation,
is
taken
two
wayes
in
the
Scriptures
:
firil,
when
as
the
thing
imputed
is
in our felues, and
fo
it
is Paid,
Pfal.a
06.3-1
.
that
the
fa&
of
Phinees
was
imputed vnto
ic6.;
r;
him
for
righteoufheffe;
fo
Rom.5.13.
But
fin
is
netimputedibhile
Prat
there
is
no
law.
Secondly,
when
as
the
thing imputed
is
out
Ron'
5'3
ofourfelues;
and
of
this, mention
is
made,Leuitr7.4.
and
.
ic.i
',4
Nurnb.l8.zy.
And
in
this
latter
fenfe
the
word
is
to
bec
vn-
LNeaurn.
rg.
derflood
in
the doctrine ofiuftification,and
not
in the
for-
mer. For
our
finnes
were
imputed vnto Chrifl, when
hee
of-
fered
himfelfe
to fluid
in
our
place,
to
pay our
debt
and
to
make
fuilfatisfa6ion to
his fathers iuflice, by fuffering
thole
punifhments which
we
by
our
finnes
had deferued
; in
which
refpe9
the
Scriptures
fay
that
he ;gas
reputed
among'?
the
wic- Mari x.re,
kfd,Mark
15.28.an
d
that
he
rvis
;;
de (inne
for
vs,
2.
Cor.5.2I
.
Cor.S,sf.
not
by
infufion
ofour
finnes
and corruptions
into
his
moll
holy
nature,but
by
imputation onely.And contrariewife, we
are
made
iull or
iuflified,
not by
infufion
of
inherentrigh-
teoufneffe
into
vs,
but
by imputation
of
Chrifls
righteoui-
nes;
when
as
beleeuing
in
him,
notwithllandingthat
our-
is
ilill
defiled
with
fin
&
manifold
corruptions,
through
the
meere mercy
and
free
grace
of
God
for the
merits
and
obedience
ofChrifl,
wee
are
reputed
itifl,
as
though
we
had
neuer
committed
finne,
and had performed
perfe&
obedi-
ence
vnto
Gods
commandements, and
fo
adiudged
heires
of
euerlafting life.
So
that
this
imputation
confifleth
not
in
Gods reputing
of
vs
iuil,in
refpe&
ofour
inherent righteoufieffe
iiafufed
into
vs;
but
in
the
free
mercie and
graceofGod,
which
for
Chrifl
his fake
cóuereth
our
finnes,
Which
are indeede
-im.
herent
in
vs,
fo as
they
(hall
neuer bee
imputed
vnto
vs
for
our
condemnation,
and
imputeth vnto
vs
the
righteoufnes
which
is
not
in
vsbut
in
Chrifl, wherewith
--
btingfully
pof-
.feífed,he
reputeth ofvs,
as
moil innocent and
perfeótly nigh-
.s_
teous.
Now,
that
imputation
is
to'bé'vnderflood-in
this
latter
The
former
fenfe,it
is
moll
manifefl
where
5,
A á81e
Paul
fctteth downc
l'oitrt
proouett
I?
lfydeeitxonies
the
word
in
both
thefe
fenfes,
denying
that
in
this doctrine
afrbe
$e.rip.
of
ïufification,it
is
to
be
vndërflood
of
the former,
and
añrr- tows
~PP
-
tniá