L 127 1 Edward's Reign were not of the fame Opinion, and therefore the latter Sen- timents have no Right to be cail'd the DoUrine of the Reformation. There is fomewhat very fevere in Mr. N's Reflehion, p. i o5. " I don't findNír. &. in his cc any of thefe Free-Millers at the lzd Edition. ai " S`ake. There was no Occafion to the ys Charge oto t. mention them in this difadvantageous another Per- manner, when his Proof is no more than f,° " , i dn't find Vic." this : ¡hey did not take Notice ofPays my Au- any Differences with their Proteflant thor, but names Wanehe ; Brethren, when they came to dye for and the IA the Proteflant Cage. " If (f ays be) Authority he " any of them fuffer'd, they made nog ¡l a Burnet. " mention of their Diftinguifhing Opi-is it in his " nions, when they came to die.'' Writings? Mr. Strype has preferved A Pi.ousmem.vot.nr. Letter againf complying with Idola- APPen. I13. trous Worfip, in ,Queen Mary's Days, written by a Free-will Man; which he fuppofes tobe wrote by HenryHart, one of the chief of them, and afterwards a Prifoner. Mr. N's Account of H. HartN's nti. and others is, that "they ran their Noti-P. L03. ons as high as the modernArminians, " or as'Pelagiushimfelf, defpifingLearn- " ing," &c. He quotes noAuthority, nor producesany evidence tofupport this loco vy Cenfure, which plainly is not levell'd only at thofe who believed the Freedom of theHumanWill in Q. Mary's Days. CHAP.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=