Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  124 / 504 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 124 / 504 Next Page
Page Background

C

A

?.I11.

§:2S.

Condit.

Purpofes

not

to

be

argued

from condit. Threats,

68

Betides, in

the

Cafe

of

Paul,though

the

infallibility

of

the

Predi

&ion

did

not

in

the

leaft

prejudice

the

Liberty

of

the

Agents, who were

tobe

imployed

for

its

accomplifhment,

but

left roome for

the Exhortation

of

Paul,

and

the

endeavours

ofthe

Souldiers,yet

it

cutts off

all pofiibility

ofa

contrary

event

and

all fuppofall

ofa

difjunetive purpofe

in

God,upon the accoinpt

whereof

he

cannot

predi&

the

iffue,or event

of

any

thing whatfoever.

But

of

this

more largely afterward.

But this

is

farther

Argued by Mr

Goodwin

, from

the

purpofes

of

God

in

4,

28.

his

threatnings,in thefe words.

Mofi

frequently the

purpofe

and

Decree

of

God,

concerning the punifhment

of

wicked

and

ungodly

men, is

expreffed

by

the

Holy

Ghofl, abfolutely

and

certainly, without the

leafy

mention

of

any

condition,

of

re-

laxation

or

reverfion

:yetfrom

other

pafages

of

Scripture

it

is

fully

evident

,

that

this

Decree

of

his

is

conditional/, in

fuch

a

fence, which

imports

a non

-

execution

of

the punifhment therein declared,

upon

the repentance

of

the

Perfons,

againfi

wheat

the

Decree is.

In

like

manner

though the

purpofe

and

Decree

of

God,

for

the

jufli-

fication

of

thofe who

are

called,

(and

for

the Glorifying

of thof

e

that

(hall

be

7u-

flifzed)

be

(in

the Scripture

in

hand)

delivered in an

abfolute

and

unconditioned

forme

of

words

;yet

is

it

no way neceffary to

fupofe,

(the

mo

fi

familiar

frequent,

and

accuflomed

expref

on

in scripturein fach

cafes,

exempting

us

from

any

f

ich

necef

ty)

that

therefore

theft

Decrees

muff needs

bring

forth againft

all

pof

ble

interveniences whatever;

fa

that (for

example)

he

that

is

called

by

'the.Word

and

Spirit,

muff needs

be

uffified,

whether

he

truly

Believe or

no

and

he

that

is

fu-

flifted mull

needs

be

Glorified, whether

he Perfevere or

no.

Anf.

I.

That

the

Threatnings

ofGod

are

moral/

A

&s,

not

declarative,

as

toParticular Perfons,of

Gods

Eternall.

Purpofes,

but

fubfervient

to

other

ends

togetherwith

the

Law it felfe,whereof they are

a

Portion;(as the

avoy-

ding

of

that

for

which men

are

threatned)

is

knowne.

They

are

Appendixes

of

the Law,and

in

their Relation thereunto,declare the Connexion,that

is

be-

tweene

Sinne

and Pnnifhment,fuch

Sinnes

and

fuch

Punifhments

2.

That

the

Eternall Purpofes

of

God

concerning

the

workes

of

his

Grace,are

to

be

meafured

by

rule and

Analogy

of

his

Temporal!

Threatnings,

is

an Affertion

firiking

at

the very

Root

of

the Covenant

of

Grace, and

effi-

cacy

of the

Mediation

of

the Lord

Jefus, yea

at the

very being

Of

Divine

Perfe

&ions

of

the nature

of

God

himfelfe.

This there

is

indeed

in

all

Threat..

nings

declared

of

the

abfolute Purpofe,and Unchangeable Decree

of

God,

that all

impenitent

finners fhall

be

punifhed

,

according

to what

in his

Wif-

dome; and Righteonfneffehe bath apportioned

out unto

fuch

defervings,and

threatneth

accordingly. In this

regard there

no Condition,

that

doth, or

can(in the leafl)import

a

non-execution

of

the Punifhment Decreed; Neither

do

any

of

the Texts

cited

in

the

Margent

of

our Author, proove

any

fuch

thing. They.

all

indeed

pofitively

affirme

,

Faithlefe,

Impenitent

unbelievers

hall

be Deftroyed,

which

no

fuppofall

whatfoever,

that

takes

not

away

the

Subje&

of

the

Queftion,

(and

fo

alters

the

whole

thing

in

Debate)

can

in

the

leaft

infringe. Such

affertions(I

fay)are parts

of

the

Law

of

God revealing

his

will

in

General],

to

Punifh impenitent Unbelievers, concerning which

his

Purpofe

is

abfolute,Unalterable,and

Stedfaft.

The

conclufion

then,which Mr

Goodwin

makes,

is

apparently

racked

from

the

words ,

by

flretching them upon

the unproportioned

bed

of

other

Phrafer,and

Expreffions wholly

Heterogeneous

to the

defigne

in

this place in-

tended,

Added here are fuppofed

Conditions in

generail,

not

once explay-

ned

to

keepe them from being expofed

to that

fháme

that

is

due unto

them,

when

their

(intrufion without

all

order

or

warrant

from

Heaven)

fhail

be

manifefted

;only wrapped

up in

the

Clouds

ofpoffible Interveniences,when

the

A&s