Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  133 / 504 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 133 / 504 Next Page
Page Background

Our

Expofccion

of

thofeplaces, vindicated.

C

A.

pill.

4:

;8.

dall among

Believers

thereon

(as

in fuch cafes

it

will fall

out)

infued;&

with-

77

all

a

Temptation

of

a

not

to

be

defpifed

prevalency

,

and

fad confequence,

(which we formerly

granted

to

attend

fuch

eminent Apoftafie)

feems

to have

laid

hold

on many

weake Saints: they feared,leaft

they alto might be over

-

throwne,

and

after

all

their

labouring,

and

Peering

in

the Work

of

Faith,and

Patience

of

the

Saints, come short

of

the

inarke

of

the high calling

fet

before

them, confidering their own

weakneffe

and

instability,

with

that

powerfull

oppofition,whe,reunto

(in

thole

daies

efpecially)

they

were expofed.Upon

the

contemplation

of

fuch

Apoftafes

or

defections,

they wereopportune

and

ob-

noxious

fufficiently

to

this

Temptation.

Yea

their thoughts

upon

the

Cafe

under

confideration, might lead them

to

feare

a

moregenerall

defeétion

: for

feeing

it

is

thus with

forne, why

may

not

this be

the

Condition of

all

Belie=

vers?

and

fo

the

whole Church may ceafe;and come

to

nothing, notwithftan-

ding all

the

Promifes

of

building

it

on a

Rock,

and

of

the

prefence

of

Chrift

with

it to the

end

of

the World. Nay

may

not

his

whole Kingdome on

earth

on this account

,

poffibly fall

to

utter

ruine

,

and

himfelfe be left

a Head

without

members,

a King

without

Subje

&s

?

This

by

Mr

Goodwin:

own

con

-

feffion,

is

the

Objei on,which

the

Apoftle anfwereth,

and

removes

in,

and

by

the

words

under

Confideration. Cap.

r4.pag.35g.

36o.

Seeing thefe

fall

away,

are not

wee li&ewife

in

danger

of

falling

away,

and fo

of

Tooling

all that

we

have

done

andfujfered in

ourChri

ian

profe on?To

this

ObjetIion

or Scruple,

the A-

poftle Anfwereth

in

the Words

in

hand;

So

he

Thus

farre then are

we

agreed.

About

the

fence

of

the words themfelves, and

their

Accommodation

to

the

removall

of

the

Objeftion, or

Scruple

nientioned,is our

difference.

I

know

Dot

how M.

Goodwin

comes

to

call

it

an

Objetlion

or

Scruple,( which

is

the

ex-

preflion

of

thoughts

or

words,

arifing

againO

that

which is,

in

the

truth

ofit)

Peeing

it

is

their very

State and Condition indeed, and

that,which

they feare,

is

that

which they are really expofed

unto, and

which

they ought

to

believe

that

they

are

expofed

to. In

his

Apprehenfion,

they who

make

the

Objeëlion,

or

whole

scruple

it was, were

as

liable

unto

in

his

judgement,

and

in

the

fame

danger offalling

away,

or greater, (their Temptations

being

increafed, and

heightned by the

Apoftafie

of

others) then them

that

fell

the

day and

hour

before,

neither could

that

falling away

of

any

be

Paid

to

raife

a

Scruple in

them

that

they might do

fo

to,

if

this were one

part

of

their Creed,

that

all

and

every

man

in

the

world might

fo

doe.

The

Anfwer given

by

the

Apoftle,

is

no

doubt

fuited

to

the

Objetlion

and

st.

38é

fitted

to the

removeall

of

the

Scruple

mentioned,

which

was

alone

to

be

accomplished by an effe&uall

removing

away

the

felicitous fears

and

cares

about the

prefervation

of

them,

in

whofe behalfe this

is

produced. This

therefore the

Apoftle

doth by

an exception

to the

inference,

which they,

made, or

through temptation

might make upon

the former

confederations.

(AP

701

are exceptive particles, and

an

Indutlion

into the

exemption

of

Tome

from

the condition

of

being

in

danger

of

falling, wherein they were

conclu-

ded in the

Objellion

propofed.

The

intendment

I

fay

of

the

Apoftle

in

that

exceptive plea he

puts

in

,

nevertheleffe

is

evidently

to

exempt force from

the ftate

of

falling away, whichmight be argued againft

them

from

the de-

feftion

of

others.

Neither doth

he fpeake

to

the thing

in

hand, nor are the

particulars mentioned

exceptive

to

the former Intimation,

if

his

fpeech

looke

any

other

way.

'Moreover he

gives

yet further the account

of

thisException

he

makes,

including

a

radicali discrimination

of

profeffours,

or

men

elleesned

to

belielievers, exprefíing alfo

the

Principle and ground

of

that

difference.

The

differing

Principle

he

mentioneth

is,the

Foundation

of

God

that

Rands

fare,

or the

firma Foundation

of

God,

that

is

eftablifhcd,

or

ftands firme: This

is

not

L

3

worth