Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  363 / 504 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 363 / 504 Next Page
Page Background

A(%rtors

of

Sts

Perf

compared

with

their

Adverferies.

C,YILL

pry, who

fha11

undertake to

deny and oppofe

it,

I'hope

the

People

ofGod

in

307

'this

Nation,

will

not have many

Inffances

to

Judge

by:

The

belt conje

&ure,

we can for the prefent make

of

what

will be

hereafter,

muff

be

taken

from

what hath

already

come

to

paffe;

and

the bell

guef

e

of

what events

will

be,

are to

be railed from

the

confederation

of

what hath been; from

a like

dif-

pofition

of

Caufes,to an Anfwerableneffe

of

Events.

What Mr

Goodwin

bath

to

plead

in

this

Cafehe

infifts

on

Chap.9.

Seti:24,

4

4,

25,26,27.

Pag.

167,168,169,17°,171,172.

The

fuenme

and

dime

of

his

Dif-

courfe,

is

to

Apologize

for

his

Do&rine againft fundry Obje&ions, which

in

the Obfervations

of

men

it

is

lyable and obnoxious

unto. Now thefe are

fuch

as

whatever the

Iffue

of

their Confideration prove, doubtleffe

it can be

of

no Advantage

unto

his

Caufe,

that

his

Do&rine

is

fo

readily expofed

to

them.

The

firft

of

thefe

is,

that

the

Do6trine he

Oppofeth,

and

in

Oppo

fition

where-

ß.

q.

unto that

is

let

up,which he

fo

induftrioufy

afferts,hath generally been recei-

ved and imbraced,by men eminent

in Piety

and

Godlineffe,

famous on

that ac-

count

in

their Generations,

with

the

generality.

ofthe

People

ofGod,

with

them.

And this is

attended

with

that

which

naturally

infues

thereon,

viz.

The

Scandaloufneffe

ofthe

molt

of

them (yea

of

them

all

of

this

Nation

is

it

fpoken, who have formerly

afèrted

the

Do&rine which

Mr

Goodwin

bath

lately efpoufed;

Whereunto

in

the third

place an

Obfervation

is

fubjoyned,

of

the

Ordinary defection

of

men

to

loofe

and

unfavory

pradifes, after

they

have

once

drunke

in

theprinciples

of

that

opinion, which

he now

fo

induflrioufly

mix-

eth

and

tempereth

for them;It

is

ufually

Paid

there

isnofmoake,but where

there

is

fomefire;It would be ftrange

if loch

Obfervations

as

thefe,fhould be readily

and

generally made by men, concerningthe Do&rine

under

Conteft, unlefle

there

were

Tome

evident

occafion

Adminiftred by

it thereuto.

And

I

'Miff

needs

fay,that

if

they prove

True,

and hold under Examination, they

will

be-

come

as

urging

a

prejudice, as

can lightly

be laid againft

any caufe in

Religion

whatfoever.

The

Gofpell

being

a

DoElrine

according unto

Godlinefjé,

feverall

perfwafions

pretending to be

pacts

and portions thereof,

if

one

(hall

be found

to

be

the

conftant Faith, and,profeffion

of

thofe,

who allo have the

life

and

power

of

Godlineffe in

them; the other to

be

maintained by

evill

men

audfe-

ducers,

who upon their receiving

it,

doe allo wax

worfe

and

worfe;

it

is

no

fmall

advantage

to the

firft,in its plea for

admittance

to

the right

and

title

of

a

truth ofthe

Gofpell.

To

Evade

this

charge

Mr

Goodwin

premifes this

in

General!.

ß.

6.

The experience

Aférted in

the

Objellion, is not

fo

unqueflionable

in point

of

Truth,

But

that

i

f

the

elfferters were

put

home upon

the

proofe,they would

(I

feare)

(doubtleffe he

rather

hopes

it)accompt,more

in

prefumption

than in

reafonablenes

o

fArgument.

For

i

f

Perrous

of

the

one

judgement,

&of

the ather,were

duly compared

together,

I

verily believe there

would

be

found

every

whit,

as

full

a proportion

of

men, truly Confcientiour

and

Religious, amongfl thofe

whofe

judgements Hand,

and

have_flood

for

a

po

ìbility

of

falling

away,

As

on

the other

fide:

but through a

foolifb

and

unfavoury

kind

of

partiality,

we

are apt,

on

all hands,

according

to

the

Proverb, to account

our own

Geefe

for

swamies ,

and

other mensswamies

Geefe5

Certaine

I

am,

that

if

the

writings

of

men

of

the

one

judgement,

and

of

the other,

be

compared

together,

and

an

e

f

imate

made

from

thence

of

the Religion, Worth,

and

Holineffe

of

the Authors refperlively,

Thofe who'oppofe

the

common

Dotirine

of

Perfeverance,

doe

account

it

no Robbery to

make themfelves

everyway

equal/

in this

honour

with their

oppofers5

The

truth

is,

I

f

it

be

law

fullfor

me to

utter what

I

re-

ally apprehend,

and judge in

the

care,

I

doe

not

find

that

fpirit

o

f

holinefe

,

to

breath

with that Authority, height

or Excellency

of

power

in

the

writings

of

the

R

r

2

latter,