Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  386 / 504 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 386 / 504 Next Page
Page Background

C. XV.

The

fallacious

ground of

this Argument

of

M,Gs.

33o

into

they

may

fall,

that

finnefhould

reigne

in

them

:

nothing

gives

Sinne a

Reigne

and dominion,

but

a

totali

deft&

of

all

true

grace

whatever,

not

only

as

to the

exerting

it

(elfe,

but

as

to

any

habituall

reli

&s

of

it;

It may be over

wbelmed fomettmes with Temptations and corruptions,

but

it

is

Grace

Rill,

as

the lestl fparke

of

fire

is

fire',

though

it

fhould be covered with never

fo

great

an

heape

of

afhes,

and

it

reignes

then.

A

i3

Thirdly,

That

Regenerate

perlons

finne

not

with

their

whole

and

full

con-

fent,

Confent

may

be taken

two

wayes; Firft

Morally,

for approbation

of

the

thing done;

fo

the Apoftle

faies,

that

in

the

inward man, he did

confent

to

the

Law,

that it

wan

good.

Rotn.7.

I6.

that

is,

he

did

approve

it

as

fuch,like it, delight

in

it

as

good; and thus

a

Regenerate

man

never

contents

to

finne;

no nor

un-

regenerate

perfons

neither,

unleffe

they are

fuch

as

being

"päiÏ

feeling are given

up to

work

with

greedineffe;

a

Regenerate

perfon

is

fo

farre

from

thus

contenting

to

finne,

that

before

it,

in

it, after

it,

he

utterly

condemnes,dif=

allowes, hates

it

as

in himfelfe,

and

by himfelfe

committed.

Secondly, Con

-

Pent

may

be taken

in

a

Phyficall

fence,

for the concurrence

of the

command-

ing, and

aCting

principles

of

the

foule

unto

its

operations: and

in

this

fence

an

unregenerate man

finnes

with

his

full

confent,

and

his

whole will;

a

Regene-

rate

man

doth

not,

cannot doe

fo',

For though there

is

not

in

that

confent

to

thine, which

his

will, inclined by

the remaining

difpofition

of

finne in it,

doth

give,an

a&uall fenfible

Rea

&ion

of

the other

principle

,

yet

there

is

an

ex-

preffe

not contenting;

and by the power

that

it

hath

in

the

foule,

(

for habits

have

power in, and

over the

Subje

&s

wherein

the

are)

it preferves

it

from

being wholly ingaged

into

finne;

and

this

is

the great intendment

of

the

Apo-

.

ít1e, Rom.7.

rg

20.2T 22.

From what bath

been fpoken

will eafily

appeare what

Anfwer may be gi-

ß.

14;

ven

to

the former Argument, to wit,

That

notwithflanding

any

finnes

that

either the Scripture or the

experience

of

then,

do

evince

that the

Saints may

fall

int6,

yet

that

they never

finne

or perpetrate

finne

with

their

fuUan.

whole

confent,

whereby they fhould

be lookt

upon,

in

and under their

alines,

in the

fame fïate and condition with

unregenerate

perfons,

in whom finne

reigneth,

committing the

fame

finne,and

how

infufficient

any

thing produced

by

Mr

Goodwin

in defence

of

the argument

layd downe

at the

entrance

of

this

Chapter,

is

to

remove the

Anfwer given

unto it

from

Believers

not

fin-

ingwith their

whole confent may

eafily

be demonft.tated; This

he thus

pro-

pofeth.

Some to

mainetaine this

pofition,

That

all

the

flanes

of

true

Relievers

are finnes

0.55.

of

inf

rmity,

lay

hold

on

this

fliield,fuch wen,

they

fay

never

finne

with their

whole

wills, or with

full

confent, therefore

they

never finne but through infirmity,

that

they

never

finne

with

full

confent,

they conceive

they prove

fu

ffrciently

from

that

of

the

APofile,

for

the

good

that

I

would

I

do

not, but the evil!

that

I

would

not

that

I.

do,

Now

if

I

do

that

I

would not

it

is

no more

I

that

do

it,

but

finne that

dwelleth

in

me.

I

Anfwer,

firft

that

the

Saints cannotfinite but with their

whole

wills

or

full

contents is undeniably proved

by

this

confideration;

viz.

Recaufeo-

therwifethere

jisould

be

not

only a

plurality ordiverfity, but

alp

a contrariety

of

wills in thefameperf8,at

one&

the

fame inftant

of

time,

viz.

when the

fisppofed

adt

of

evill

isproduced,

now

it

is

an

impoffibility

of

the

frrft

evidence

that

therefhould

be

a plurality

of

ads

&

there

contrary

one

to

the other

in

the

famefisbjed

or

agent,

at

one

or the

fame iuffant oftime

;it

i.r

true between

the

fr/t

movings

of

the

fief')

in

a:

man

towards thecommitting

of

the

finne, and

the

compleatisig

of

the

finale

by

an

AtluallandExternall

patration

of

it,

there

may

be

fuccevely

in him

noi"

only

a

plurality but even

a

contrariety

of

V

olitions or

Motions

of

the

will

according to

what

the scripturefpeal¿eth concerningthe

flefb Fulling

againji the Spirit, and the

spirit