Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  468 / 504 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 468 / 504 Next Page
Page Background

C. XVII.

D.P.

his

fence

oftheRighteous

perfon here intended,confidered.

4r

is

affociated)

will evince any fuch

meaning

in

his

expreffìon,as

is

there inten-

ded by Mr

Goodwin

Juflification

is

and

it

was fo

taught

by

the

Doîlor

to

be

(

Lea.

de

70. )

in refpe&

of

all pectoris

that

are partakers

of

it equall

:

and

equall

to

every perfon

Co

partaking

of

it,

at

all

times; though

in

regard

of

fence,

and

p?rception,

and

the

peace

and comfort,wherewith

when perceived,

and felt,

it

is

attended,

it

is

no

lefi'e

fubje&

to

encreafes

and

wanings

than

San&ification

it

felfe. So

that

this

alto

might

be

attended

by

the

Doaor

with-

out the

leafy

firaine

of

new

Divinity,

that

Juftifyed and

San&ifyed

perlons,

though

they might

fo

decline from the courte ofclofe walking withGod,

as

for

a feafon

to

be like

a

tree

in

Winter,

whole fubftance

is

in

his

roots,

his

leaves and

fruite

falling

offceaung

to

bring forth the

fruits

of

Holinefre, in

fuch

degrees

as

formerly; and

fo

loofe

their

fence

of

acceptátion

with

God,

through

Chrift, and the peace, with confolation, and

joy

wherewith it

is

at-

tended, yet they

could

not nor

thould

not,

wholly be

cart

out

of

the favour

of

God; the

nature

and

&fence

of

their

Juftification being abiding ; and what

ungular firaine

of

Divinity there

is,in

the

tendency

of

fuch a

difcourfe

I

know

not;

Betides

that

teaching

of

magi"

and

minus

in

Juftification fhould be any

fingular

thing

in Mr

Goodwin, I

do not

well

underftandi

for

if

the matter

of

our

RighteoulnefCe,

or that

upon the imputation whereof unto

us, we

are

Juftifyed,

may

have

its

degrees,

and

receive

magis

and

minus

as

certainely

our

Faith,

may

and

doth;

why our Juftification may not

do

fo

too,

I

fee

no

Keaton.

But he comes

at

length

to

the matter

and

addeth.

3.

Laf

ly,were

it

granted

unto

the

Dotlor,thatfrom

a

mans

turning

afide

from

his

own Holineffe,

it

doth not follow,

that

therefore

he

bath

wholly

diverted

him-

felfe ofthe

Xighteoufneffe

ofChrit

imputecbyet

from

Gods

determination,

or

pro-

_

'zincing

a

man

to

he

in

an

efifate

of

condemnation,&

of

deatb,it

followes roundly,

that

therefore

he

is

diverted

of

the

liigbteoufneffe

of

Chri

fl

imputed

(if

ever

he

were

inverted with

it

before)

becaufe no

man with

that

HiQhteoufneffe

upon

him,

can

be

in

filch an

eftate.

Now we

have

upon

feverall

grounds proved,

that

the

Righteous man under

that

Apo

f

acy;

wherein Ezechiel defcribes

and

prefents

him,

is

pronounced

by

God, a

child,

not

of

a teeaporall,'

but eternall death

and

condem-

nation,

This

indeed the Dollor

deny-es,

but gives

no

reafon

ofbis

denyall,

far

which

I

blame him not.

Only

I

muff

crave

leave to

fay,

that

the Chair weigheth not

fo

much,as

one

good Argument,reitb me;much

leffe,ae

many.so

that all

this while,he

that

fpake; and

.ffillfpeakes unto the world,

by

Ezekiel, is

no

friend

to

that

Do-

élrine,which

denyeth

a

poffibility

of

a

righteous

mans declining

even'

unto death.

Anf.

If

this

be

all

that

Mr

Goodwin

bath to

fay, for

the removall

of

this

Anfwer,

that

cuts

the

throat

of

his

Argument,

Wit

be not removed, hehath

little

Reafon for the

confidence wherewith,

he

clofeth

it,

concerning

Gods

fpeaking in this

place

of

Ezechiel, again

ft that Dòtlrine

which. in

innumerable

places

of

his

Word

he

hath taught

us,

as a

Doctrine enwrapping

no finail

portion

of

that

Grace,

which

in

a

Covenant

of

Mercy

he difpenfeth to

his

chafen,

Redeemed; 7uflifyed,

sanaifyedones

teether

is

here

any

need

to adde,

the

weight

of the

Chair

(wherein yet

that

perfon fpoke of, behaved

himfel£e

worthily in'his Generation, and

was

in his

Exercifes

herein, by no

meanesby

Mr

Goodwin

to

bedefpifed)

be laid upon the Reafonings

of

the Dolor

in

this

cafe, they proving

fingly

ofthemfelves, too

heavy

for Mr

Goodwinto

Beare.

In

briefe

that

the fubftanceofthe

reply

in

hand,

is

meerely

a begging

of

the

thing

in

Qgeftion, any one

that

bath

but halle an

eye in

the

bufinefCa

of

this

nature,

may

eafily

difcerne;

that

it

is

-

fuppofed

that

a

man

truly

Righteous

and

Juftifyed

in

the

blond

of

Chrift, may

fo

fall away,

as

to bepronounced

of

God

to be

in

aRate

of

damnation,

and

fo

fallen really

from

his

former

condi-

tion

(Korn.

8;

t.)

is

the

thing

that

Mr

Goodwin

bath

to prove; Now

faith he,

this