Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  750 / 772 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 750 / 772 Next Page
Page Background

724Obrettiortsag4inf

perfcuerancetakenfromexampleranf

filch

like

whomwe vtterly

denie

to.haue.euer

had

faith,iu.

fliftcatiou,or

any

other

fatting grace

;

fo

that

their

apoflafie

from

their

former

profeffion,was

not

a

falling from faith

which they neuer

had,

but,

onelya

dete6ion

and

difcouerie

ofthem,,

whereby

was

made

uianifef+

what

they

in

truth.

were,namely,that

what

Phew

foeuer they had

formerly made

yet they

were neuer

in the hate

ofgrace,nor

yet indued

with.

a.true

iuf+ifying

faith,

Butxhat wee

may defcend

vnto

particulars

;

firfl

they

al-

leage

the

,

example

of

euill

Angels, which,howfoeuer

they,

were

Gods moil

excellentcreatures,

and indued.plentifullie.

with

many

fingular

gifts and

graces, yet they

perfeuered

not-

ion

this

ef+ate,

but

lof+

their

graces, and made a

fearefull

apo-

flafie from

God.But

if

we

would

fee

what

force

this,and

the..

ref+

of

the

examples

produeed,haue

to

the

.prefent

purpofe,

we

Mail

eafily

difcerne

it,

if

we difpofe

the

example

which

is-

their

argument, whereby they

conclude

their queflion,

to-

gether

With

the queflion

it

felfe

in

a

fyllogifine

after

this

manner

:

.

Tbae ampleof

:

The

Angels

fell

from grace

loll their

iufhifeation,

and

ah

h¢cis.

faith,and

became cal

+awaies

But

the

Angels were men in

the hate

of

grace,.

iuf+ifted,

and indued with

true

faith

.

And therefore

certainemen

being

in

the hate

of

grace,iu-

flif

ed,and indued

with

true

faith,

may fall from

grace,

lofe

;

their

iuflihication,and

faith,

and become

caflawaies.

Whereby

the iinpertinencie

of

this allegatjon

to

the

con-

cluding

of

this quei

+ion

plainely appeareth. For

ñrf+

the

Angels

are

not..men,

of

whótn,alone the

quef+ion is

pro-

.

pounded;

they

were

not

in

the hate ofgrace,as the queflion

vilderliandeth it,

that

is,

the grace

of

redemption,

but

of

creation, onely;

they

were

not

iuf+ified

by.Chrifis imputed

ri

ghteouf

effe,

but

flood

iu(l

in their

owrie

inherent

righte-

o

:ftieffe;

they

had

no iuflifying

faith,

feeing

there

was.neuer

any promife

made_

vnto them that

Chrif+

fhould be

giuerz as.

their

by whole

righteou1

effe

they Mould

be.iu-

ff.

d

Thefcránd

example is,

of,

our. ,frf+parents

which

is

alike.

=.

irnperti11e4r