CAP.
XV.
gg.
Elfitintattt*
itth
fi
sihe
kt
145'4445
V4if
IVA
:144
WV-44
t
M.G'sfift Argumentfor the
Apofafyof
time
Believers.
2.
Theweight
of
this Argumenttákenfront
the
fins
ofBelievers. The
difference between
the
fins
of
Believers
and
unregenerate
perfons
propofed
to confideration.
3.
lames
1.
r4,15. The
rife and progreffe
ofLuf
and Sinne.
4.The
fountain
of
all fmne, in all perfons isLull. Rom.7.7.
5.Obfervationsclearing the
difference be
tween
Regenerare
and unregenerateperfons
in
their
finning
,
as
to the
common fountains
of
all finne:
The
firt.
6. The
fecond
of
the univerfality
of
Luft in
the foule
by nature.
7.
The
Third,
in
two
inferences:
the
firf,
unregenerate
men finne
with
their whole confent.
8.
The
Second inferenceconcerning the raigne
offinne,
and raigning finne. 9. The
Fourth,
concern-
ing
the
univetfall pofeffion of theSoule
by
renewing Grace. to. The fift,that true
Grace bears
rule where ever
it
be.
r 1.
Inferences from the former confiderations.
The
firf,that
in every
regenerare perfon there are dicerie principles
of
all Morali
operations. Rotw7.19.so. opened:
12.
The
fecond, that finne
cannot
raigneina
Regenerate perfon. 13.
The third
,
that
Regene-
rate perfonsfinne
not with their whole
confent.
14.
Anfwer to the Argument at the entrance
propofed. Believersnever
fnnewith
their wholeconfent
and
willes.
r5.
M.
G's attempt
to
remove the Anfwer. 16.
Ris
exceptions confidered and removed. Plurality of,Wills
in
the
fame perron
in the Scripture
fence :
of
the oppófition between
tefh
and
fpirit: that no
Regene-
rate perfon finnes
with
his full confent proved. 17. Of
the Spirit
and his
Lufings
in us.
18.
The
Aainggs
of
the fpirit in
us
free,
not
fnfpendedon any
conditions
in us. 19.
The
fame
farther
manifefted. 20. M.G's difcourfe
of
the
firf
and
recond motions
of thefpirit
confide-
red.
21.
The
fame
confiderations farther carried on. 22.
Peter Martyrs
Tefimony
confi-
dered.
23. Rom.7.
r9.2o.
confidered. 24. Differencebetween the oppofition
made
to
fin
in
perfons Regenerate,and that in perfons unregeneratefarther argued.
25.
Of
the
fence
of
Rom:
7. and in what
fence Believers
doe the
works of
theliefh. 26.
The
dole of
there
confderati.
ons. 27. The Anfwer ro the Argumentat the entrance
of
the
Chapter opened. The Argument
new
formed: the MajorPropofition limited
,
andgranted,
and
the Minor denied.
28.
The
proofe
of
the
Major confidered.Ga1.5.21. Ephef.5.5.6.
r
Cor:6.g.no. 29.
Believers howCOB.
cerned in comminations. go. Threatning proper to unbelievers
for their
finnes.
3
t.
Farther
obieetions propofed and removed. 32. (Write
progreffe
of
Saints
intempting to
finne.
33.The
effeâ
of
Luft
in
temptations.
34. Difference
between Regenerate and unregenerate perfons
as
to the tempting
of
Luft,
O.)inrefpeaofnniverfality,
(2.)
of
Power.
35. ObjeRions An.
fwered.
;6.
Whether
Believers finne only out
of
infirmity. 37.
Whether
Believers may
finne
out of
Malice, and
with deliberation.
38.
Of
the
fate
of
Believers,
who
iupon
their
finne
may
be excommunicated. 39. 40.
Whether
the Body
of
Chrift
may
bedifinembred. What body
of
Chrift it is that
is
intended. 41.
Mr G.
thoughts to this purpofe examined. 42.
M.
G.
difcourfe
of
the
way
whereby Chrift keeps
or
may
keep his members examined. 43.
Members
of
Chrift
cannot
become members
of
Satan:
1
Con
6.15. confidered. 44.
of
the fenceand
ufe
of
the word
/legs.
45. Chrift takes
Members
out
of
the power
of
Satan, gives up none to him. 46. Repe.
rirjon
of
Regeneration
all'erted
byrise
Doârine ofApotafy. 47. The
Repetition difproved.
48. M.G. notion
of
Regenerationexamined at large and rebuked. 49. Relation between God
and hisChildren
indifoluble.
50.
The
farther
progrefe
of
Luft
for the
produâion of
finne,
it
draws
of,
and entangles:
drawing
away
what
it
Is. 51.
The
ditance
between Regenerate and
nnregenerateperfons in
their
being
drawn
away by Luft. 52.
Farther defctipdon of
him
who
is
drawn
away by Luft: and
of
the
difference formerly mentioned. 53.
Of
Lofts enticing. 54.How
farte
this
may
befall regenerate men.
To
do
finite
Roma.
what
it
inteudeth,
55.
Lots
concei-
ving, wherein it
confits.
56.
Of
the bringing
forth
of
finne,
and how
farre
the
Saints
of
God
may
proceed therein.
57.
n
lob.
3.9.
opened: the
fcope
of
the
place
dircovered; 58,
Vindica-
ted.
59.
T
he words farther opened. The propofition in the
words
univerfall
:
inferences from
thence. 60. The fitbjeä
of
that Propofition confidered,
every one that
is
borne
of
God , what
is
affirmed
of
them: what meant
by
committing
of
finne.
6r.
M.G. 0ppofition
to
the
fence
of
that
exprellion
given. Realons
for the confirmationof
ir.
62.
M.G.Reafonsagainf
it,
propo-
fed
and confidered. do. The farther Expofition
of
the word carried
on
:
How
he that
is
borne
of
God
cannor
finne: feverall kinds
ofimpoffbility.
64.
M.
G.
attempt to Anfwer the
Argu-
ment
from this place.
65.
Particularly examined. 66.
The
Iteafoils
of
the Propofition
in
the
Text
confidered:
of
the
feed
of
God abideth:
the
nature
of
thatfeed, what
it
is, wherein it
con-
fits.
67.
Of
the abiding
of
this
feed.
68.
Of
the latter parr
of
the
Apotles
Beaton, he
is
borne
of
God:
our Argument
from
the words. 69.
M.G.
indeavour
to
evade
that Argument:
his
expo-
,
bawl