Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  414 / 504 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 414 / 504 Next Page
Page Background

c.XV.

Reg: not

a

reiterating

of

the

Condition wherein

men

are

borne.

3

58

our

new

birth

is

called

ourRegeneration,

or new generation,

in

allufion to

our naturali

birth,

not

as a

repetition

of

it

neither

is

the

Allufion in refpe&

of

the contrary qualityes wherewith the one,and the other are attended, but

in refpe&

of

the

things themfelves,

in which

regard,

as

they

are not the

fame,

fo

they are

not

contrary

but

diveri.

They

are both births, the one

Natural/

the

other

Spirituall;

Naturali

and Spirituali

in

that

fence are

not

contrary qua-

lityes,

but

diverfe adjuncts;

and

fo

are the two births compared,

r Pet.

I.

23.

Iohn

r.

13.

In

which laft place

Our

Regeneration

is

expreft under

the

fimple

terme of

being,borne,with

difiinetion

to

the naturali birth,

and not the

leaft

intimation

of

the iteration

of

any

birth or

Generation,fubjoyned;

fo

allo

is

it

Tames

r.

18. fo

that hitherto little

progreflè

is

made

by

Mr

Goodwin

towards

his

intendment

whatever it be thus then he

expreffeth it.

48

I

rather(ftith

he)conceive

that

Regeneration which the

scripture mater

appropri-

able

only

unto perfons

living

to

yeares

of

difcretion

,

who

generally

in

the

dayes

of

theiryouth,degenerate from the

innocency

of

their

childhood

&

younger

yeares,anel

corrupt themfelves

l s

with

the principles

6-

wayes

of

the world, relates not

to

the Na-

turall

generation

as

fuch,i

meane,as

naturall,but

unto the

spiritual/

egate

and

con-

dition

of

men

in

re

f

peC

oftheir

Natural/generation and birth, in and

upon

which

they are

ifnot

fimply

FJ'

abfolutely

yef

comparatively,innoeent,harmeles,

free

front

pride and

malice;

and

inrefpeJo

ftheftqualifzcations,in

Grace

and

fay'our

with

God,

upon

the account

of

the death

and

Pufferinge

of

Chrifi

for

-them,

as

we/ball

afterwards

prove.

Here you have the fumme

attic

defigne, and

the

Do/Irine

of

Regenerátiort

cleared from

all

thofe vaine

and

erroneous opinions

,

wherewith it

bath

fo

long been clouded.

It

is,

the returning

of

men

into

the

good

¡fate and

conditi-

on

wherein they are

borne, after

they

havedegenerated into

waies

of

wickecj-

neffe

we

thought

it

had

been

the

quickening

of them,

who

are

by

nature

dead intrcfpaffes

and

f

noes,

their being begotten ágaine

by

the

will

of

God,

the

bellowing

ofa

new

principle

of

Spirit

and

Life upon them

, a

Tranflatiota

from

Death

to

Life,

the

opening

of

blind eyes,making them

who were

dark-

neffe,

to

be

light

in

the

Lord. It

feemes we

have all this while

been

in

the

darke,

and

that

Regeneration indeed ,

is

only

a

returning

to that

condition

from whence

we

thought

it had been

a

delivery;

but

let

us a

little

fee

the De-

monftration

of

this

new notion

of

Regeneration.

Firti,

(he faith) the

Scripture makes

-

it

appropriable

only to

them

who conic to

yeares

of

difcretion.

Sir,your proofe

; we

cannot take your bare word

in a

thing

ofthis

importance.

In

the

place

your

felfe

chofe

to

mention,

as

the

foundation

yod laid

of

the inferences you are nowmaking,

our

Saviour

faies,

tis a

being

borne

of

thefhirit;

Both

the

Scripture make

this

appropriable only

unto

Men

of

difcretion

?

Men

only

of

difcretioh then

can

entermto the

King

-

dome of

God;

for none,

not

fo

borne

of

the

Spirit (ball

enter therein loh.3.

5.

If

none

but

men

ofdifcretion

can

be borne

of

the

Spirit, then infants have

no

o-

ther

birth but

only

that

of

the

flefh;

and

that

which is borne

of

the

fíefb

is

flejb,

Not

capable

of

entring into the

Kingdome

of

heaven; finely you

better

defervethe title

ofduru

pater in

fantum,than

He

to

whom

of

old'twas

given;

perhaps

a grofher

figment

was

never framed

by a man

of

retion.

Secondly,

It

is

true,

Infants

are

comparatively innocent,

in refpe&

of

Atilt-

all

TranfgreJfions

but

equally

nocent

and guilty with

Sinners

of

difcretion,

in

refpe&

of

natural/ irate

and condition.

They

are no

lelle obnoxious

to

that

death,from

whence

our Regeneration

is a

delivery, by the beftowing

of anew

Spirituali life,

than

a

firmer

of

an

hundred

yeares old;

A

returning to

this

condition,

it feemes,is

Regeneration.

&uantun:

eli in

rebus inane!

Thirdly, The

qualifications

of

Infants

not Regenerated,

ar

e

meerely nega-

tive