Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  425 / 504 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 425 / 504 Next Page
Page Background

t

lohn

3.9` Argued

and

Vindicated.

C.

XV.

That

this

is

in

it

felfe

PO

e

there

being no

fuch

Antipathie

in any

to

finne;

369

but that

they

may

eafily

fall

into

it, yea

and

With

great

difficulty

and labour

-

do

reffraine from

it,

as

the

Apoffle

argueth at large

Korn.

7:

So

is

it

alto

flat-

ly

contradi

&ory

to the

words themfelves:

the

Apoffle faith,

He

that

is

borne

of

God

fnneth

not, cannot

finite; He

can

finne

(faith

this Gloffe)

though

difficultly;

now

he

that

can

finne

difficultly,

can

finne:

can

finne,

and cannot finne,areflat-

ly

contradi&ory;

He

cannot

then

finne

at all, the

finne

that

is

intended

in

the

place,

of

whom

it

is

Paid

he

cannot

finne,

Thus

we

have cleared the

firft

Propofition

in

the words,

both

as

to

the

sub

-

jeEt,

every one

that

is

borne

of

God;

and the

Predicate,fanneth not cannotfinne,

Which

lift

exprefíion

,

taken

in its

only proper and

moff.ufuall fignification,

denoteth

an Impoífibility

ofthe

event,&

plainely confirmeth

in

direct

termes

the

pofition we infili

on from the words.

Mr

Goodwin

knoweth not

well,

Of

i

am able

to gather

any

thing

of

his

65à

thoughts,

from

his

exprefíìons to

the Argument

in

hand;)

what to

fay

to this

Affertion

of

the

Apofiles.

The

Argument,

he

intendeth

to

deale withall from

the

place he

cafieth into

this forme,

He

that

fanneth not neither

can

finne,

can-

not

fall

away, whofòever is

borne

of

God

fanneth not,

neither

con

finite

Ergo,

Comming

to the

confideration

of

that

expref

ion

[cannot

fin]

he findeth

out,

as

he

fuppofeth, fonr feverall acceptations

in

the

Scripture,

of

the word

[cannot]

Sz

giveth

us

an

account

of

his

thoughts upon

the

confideration

ofthê,

that

in

refpe&

ofthefe

fences

both

Propofition

sate

falfe.

Nów one

of

the

Pro=

pofitions

being

the

expreffe

language

&

literall

Expreffion

of

the

Holy Ghofi,

not

varyed

in

the leaff,there

is

no way

to

relieve himfelfe,from being

thought

and conceiv

d

to

give the

lye

to

the

Bleffed

Spirit

of

God

,

by flatly

deny=

ing what he peremptorily

affirmeth

,

but

only

by denying the word

{

cannot] to

betaken

in

this place, in any

of

the

fences

before mentioned;

Doth

he

then

fixe

on

this

courfe for

his

own

extrication

Doth

he

givein

another

fence

ofthe

word,

which

he accepts and grants

that

in

that

fence

the

affirmation

ofthe

Holy Ghofi

may be

true

¿

Not

in

the

leaf[?

Yea

plainly

for one

of

the

fences

he fuppofeth

himfelfto

have found

but

of

the

word [can-

not] viz.

That

it

is Paid

of

men,

they

cannot

do

fuch

or

fuch

a

thing, becaufe

of

their

averfeneffé

andindifpofition

to

ir, which he exemplifyeth

in

that

of

Chrifieto

the

Pharifees John

8.43.

He

afterwards

more than

intimateth,

that

this

is

the

fence,

wherein

the

words

cannot

finne are

in

this place

to

be

taken.

Se&:

34.

So

that

he will

not

allow the

Holy Ghofi

to

fpeake

the

truth

,

al-

though

he

take

his

words in

what

fence he pleafeth. Yea

and adding

a

fifth

fence,

SeCt.3

t.

Which

isall

it feemeth he could

find

out, (for

we

heare not

of

any

more)

he

denyeth

that

to be

the

meaning

of

the place,

and

fo

ihutteth up

the

mind

of

theHolyGhofi

into

Tome

ofthofe

fignificatiós,whereinif

the words

be taken (he

faith)

they

are felfe.

The

Difcourfe

of

Mr

Goodwin

Se&.

28,

29,3o.(being taken

up with the Confederation

of

the various

fignifications

of

the

word

[cannot]

and

his

inferences

thereon;taking it

in

this place,

this way

or that

way,then

it

is

fo

or

fo,fhewing himfelfe very fkilfull

at

fencing &

war-

ding offthe

force

of

our

Arguments,

as

perhaps

his

thoughts ofhimfelfe were

noon

á

review

of

what

he had done.) we

are

not

concerned

in.

And

though

it

were

very

eafy

to

mnifeff

that

in

the diflribution of.

his.inffances, for

the

exemplification

of the

feverall fignifications which

in

part

he feigneth,

and

faftneth upon

the

words,

,

he bath

been

overtaken with

many groffe

iniffakes,

forne

of

them

occationed by

other corrupt

principles

than thofe

now under confideration,

yet

none

of

the

fences infifted

On

by

him,

coming

really up

to

the

intendment

of

the

Holy Ghofi

withont

any

difadvantage

to our

caufe in

hand,being

wholly

inconcerned therein,we may

paffe

Izy

that

whole

Harangue.

E

b b

That