Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  442 / 504 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 442 / 504 Next Page
Page Background

C<xV1.

All

things impollible,

not

abfolutely

fo.

386

leffe in

many, and

i.tnpofiible only

in one

,

is

alwayes

to

be judged

simply

and

Abfolutely

impoffible; much

leffe

are

we concerned"in

it; who

fay

that

Simply

and

Abfolutely

the

falling away

of

Believers

is

Poflible, namely,

as

the

terme

poffible

relates

to

the principle

of

operation

in

them;

But

in fome re

-,

fpe

&s

only

it

is

impofíìble,

that

is,not

of

it

felfe,

but

in refpe&

of

the

external

prohibiting

caufe.

It

was

and limply

poffible,

that

the

bones

of

our

Saviour fhould have been

broken, in

the nature of

the thing it

felfe: im

-.

poffible, in

refpe&

of

the

decree

of

God;

So

are

a

thoufand

things Abfolutely

poble

in

their

owne

nature,

as

to

the

power

of

the

caufes

whereby they

might

be produced,

but

impojible in refpe&

of

Tome

external] prohibiting

caufe; Abfolutely pofíìble in

refpe&

of

their proper

caufe

and principle; im-

pofiible

in refpe&

of

the event,upon the

the

account

of

Come

external] prohi-

biting

caufe

as was

(hewed.

So

'tis

in

the bulneflé

in

hand;

We affert not

any pofiìbility

in refpe&

of

the event;

As

though

in

the

iffue

it-might

fo

come

to

paffe,

that

Believers

fhould

fall totally

and

finally from

God,

which

is

the

thing

we oppofe:

but

it

grant,in

refpe&

of

the

caufes

of

fuck

apoflacy,with

re-

ference

to

the nature

of

the thing

it

felfe;

Though

how the

poffibility might

be

reduced into

a&

Mr

Goodwin

cannot declare;

As

for the

dole of

this

Se&i-

on

concerning the

Abfolxte, Peremptory,

irref/lible

decree

of

Perfeverance

which he afcribes

to

us as

our. affertion, when he

fhall

have

convinced

us

of

the

Conditìnnall,

Non-peremptory, reverfihle decree

of

God,

which

he endea-

vours

to introduce

in

the

place

thereof,he

may

here

more'of

ús, in

the

mean

time

¡úvopev;tamp

EPµsv.

$.

22,

Seçlion

39.40. he feekes

to

alleviate the inflance comnionly

given

of

our

Saviour Chrift, who though affured

of

the

end,

(and

in refpe&

of

whom 'twas

utterlyimpoble

that

his

gloriousexaltation,fhould not follow

in

the

iffue,he

being wholly out

of

all

danger

of

being

detained under the power

ofDeath,)

yet

he Laboured, and prayed, and failed, and refilled Satins temptations,and

watched againfi him, and dealt with him,

by

weapons

taken out ofthe

word

of

God;

And in efpeciall when

the

Divell urged

him with

the argument

in

hand, that

there is no need

of

meaner or the

"ling

of

them,

when there

is a

cer-

tainty

of

the

end,

and

an

impoffibility

that

it

fhould

otherwife

fall

out,

or

the

End

not

be

brought about

and

accomplifbed,

as

he did

when

he

tempted

him

to

café

bimfelfe

headlong

from

a

pinacle

of

the

Temple

becaufe

the

Angelis

had

charge

over

him,

that

not

fo

much as his

foot

fhould

be

hurt again(]

a

(lone, whatever

he

did,

as

Sathan intimated,which

is

the tenour

of

the

Argument wherewith we

have

to

doe, he retornes

to

him

the

very Anfwer

that

we

infill

upon;

viz.

that

though

it

be

the

goodpleafure

of

God

to,

bring

us

to the

end

we aime

at,

yet

are

we

not

to

tempt

him by

a

negleet

of the

meanes

which

he bath

ap-

pointed; 'tis true, there

are Arguments

ufed

us

that

could have no place

with Chrift, being

taken

from the

Efface &

Condition

of

infirmity

and'weak-

neffe

through

finne,

wherein we

are;

which

is

a

ground

only

of

an

inference,

that if

Chrift who

was

Holy,

Harmeleffe,

undefiled,

feparate from

finners,

did

yet watch and pray and contend

againfl Sathan, muchmore fhould

we

do

fo.

But

this

loth

not at

all

take off

from

the

parity

of

Reafon

that

is

in

cafe

of

Diligent

ufrng

ofthe

meanes,

for

the

compaffing

of

the

end,

that

in

fume

re-

fpe&

is

under

an

impoffibility

of

not

being accomplifhed; For

the

removeall

of

this inflance

Mr

Goodwin

enters into

a

large Difcourfe

of

the

caufe

and

Reafon veiling

the Lord Chrift with

an

immutability

in

.good, and how

'tis

not

competent to

anyCreature:which

that it

is,never entred

into

the thoughts

of

any

to

affert

that

I

ever heard

of

Not

is

it

of

the

leaft

importance to

the

removeall

ofour

Inflame

as

to

its ferviceableneffe

unto

the end,

for

which

'tis

produced;

He tells

us

alfo,

That

in

cafe

men

be

caufed,

neceßstating

y

and-

unavoidably