Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  145 / 808 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 145 / 808 Next Page
Page Background

V

ERA!.

Epbeflan:r,Chap.I.

grace he

had, neyther doth

this follow on decreeing his fall,

but onely

the not

fuperadding

of

that

grace

whereby he would infallibly

not

have

fallen.

Gods decreeing

that

he

fhould finne

out

of

his

owne voluntary,

doth

not diminifh any

pc

wer he

had, whereby

he

might

have flood

if

he

would,but doth onely hold

backe

that

grace which would havemade

himwith

effeâ

to

will

that thing which he

was otherwife

able: the

not

putting to graceno way due,which fhouldmakehim infallibly Hand,

is

one

thing, the

fubflradling

of

Grace inabling him

to

fland

if

he

would,

is

another.

vlrgument

6.

That

which he willeth,

that

he

is

author

ofand

worketh.

We

diflin-

guifh,

that which

he willeth fo

as

to command

it, that he

is

the author

of

to

his

creature,

and

that

he

worketh

in

him

:

But

to

will the being

of

fìnne,

is

to will

that

his

creature ihall

of

his

owne accord without his

warrant

doe this

or

that.

Argument

7.

He

who

gave flrength

enough to avoid

finne and

forbade it on

paine

of

death, would not have

finne.

Anf.

It

followeth not, but thus onely,

that

he

would not have

his creature finne,

fo

as

the blame

of

it

fhould

redound

on

him

:

had

he

willed

that he

fhould

not

have finned, he

would have given

thatgrace withwhich

he

Caw

he would

not

have fallen.

Argument

8.

That

is

not to be yeelded whichmaketh

God

will

a

thing difagreeing

with

his

nature,as

allowing

it

for

good,not that

whichmaketh

him will

it fo farre onely

that

it

fhould exift, and have

being, for it

is

good

that the

evill fhould be

which

God

difalloweth

:

or thus, that which

hath naturally

and intrinfically

a

pofitive

contrariety

with Gods nature,

that

he cannot will,fuch

a

thing

finne

is

not;

for

fuch contrariety

cannot

fland

with the impoffibility

of

the

divine

nature.

Argument

9.

Gods decree

raketh

not away

mans

liberty;God doth

not

by

any out-

ward force determine the will, but

as

being more intimate

to it then

it

is

unto it

Idle.

If

man can

determine

his

will, and no way diminifh

his

power tothe contrary ; how much more

fhall

God

be able

a

Not

to

fay

that

thcOiigh

man

for

exercife be

determined to one, yet while he

doth

this

out

of

free

judgement, counting

it

fuch

as

he may doe,

or not

doe,

he cannot but worke

molt

freely.

Argument

to:

He that

is

author

of

frnne,

dothnot

punifh

it,

fo farre

forth, or

in

that

refpeet,

in

which he worketh it. Againe,

God

is

not

laid Author,

but

of

fuch things

which

he

doth not morally

by

command,and phyfrcallyby

inward operation worke

in us

:They

fhould fay, he

that

punifheth finne,

willeth not

that

finne fhould

be, which

is falfe.

Argument

I

I.

He

who giveth

his fonne

to

abolifh finne, he

doth not allow

finne

as

good

; this

followeth, or he would

not that

it

fhould

Hill

dwell

in

thofe

for whom his Sonne effeéìuallyfuffereth:But

it

wil

not follow,that

N

who

.133