Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  111 / 504 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 111 / 504 Next Page
Page Background

Rom:8.28,Confadered and Explaytiedà

CA r.l11.5:l4.

The

Purpofe according

to

which

thefe perlons are called,

is

none

other

then

that,

which the Apoflle,

cap.

9. I

r.

termes the

Purpofe

ofGod

according

to

Eleltion,

cap. r

r.

5.

The

Elation

of

Grace, as

alfo

the

fore

-

Knowledge

and

Foundation

ofGod,

as

will in

the

Progreffe

ofour

Difcourfe be made far-

therappeare, althoughI

know

not,

that

this

is

as

yetqueftioned;

The

Im-

mutability

of

this

Purpofe

of

God,

cap.

9.11,12.

The

Apoflle

demon -

firates from its Independency

in

any thing

in

thein,or

refpeté

ofthem,concer-

ning

whom

it

is,

it

being Eternall; and exprefly

fafegarded

again[}

apprehen-

lions,

that

might arife;ofany caufall or occafionallinfluence

'from

any

thing

in

them given

thereunto,

they lying

under this Condition

alone

unto

God,

as

Perlons that had

done

neither

good nor

evil

}.

And this alto

the

Apoflle

further

purfues from

the

Soveraignity,Abfoluteneffé,and

vnchangeablencff

e

of

the Will

of

God: But thefe things are

of

another Confideration.

Now this

Vnchangeable Purpofe

and

Eletlion

being the fountaine, from

whence

the

effe

&call Calling

of

Believers

doth

flow,

the prefervation

ofthein

to

the End

defigned

the

Glory

whereunto they are Chofen, by

thofe

As

of

Grace and

Love, whereby they are

prepared thereunto, hath coincidence

of

Infallibillity,as

to the

end aymed at,with the

Purpofe

it

felfe5

nor

is

it lyable

to

the

leaf}

exception, but what may be railed from

the

Mutability

and

changeableneffe

of

God

in

his

Purpofes,

and

Decrees. Hence

in

the

following

verfe

upon

the

account

of

the stability,

and

Immutability

of

this

Purpofe

of

God,the

utmofl, and moli

remote

Ende

in

reference to

the

good

thereby

defigned

unto

Believers,

though having its prefent

fubfiftence only in

that

Purpofe

of

God, and Infalible Concatenation

of

meanes

thereunto condu-

cing,is mentioned

as a

thing

a&ually

acomplifhed,

v. 30.

Herein

alto

lyes

the

Apoflles

fecond Evi

&ion

of

Confolation,

formerly layd

downe,

even

in

the

indiffoluble

Concatenation

of

thofe

A&s

of

Grace, Love,

and Favour,whereby the Perlons

of

Gods

Purpofe

or the remnant,

accor-

ding

to

the

Eldtion

of

Grace,

{hall

be

infallibly

carried

on in

their

prefent

injoyment,and unto the

full

fruition

of

the

Love

of

Chrifl.

If

we

may

take

hits

upon

his

word

(and

he fpeakes

in

the

name and Authority

of

God)

thofe

whom he

doth

fore-Know,

or

fixes his

thoughts

peculiarly upon, from

Eter-

nity,

(for the terme theft,

is

evidently difcruninated:

&

the Ad

muff needs

be

Eternall,

which in

order

of

Nature

is

previous

unto Predeftination, or the

appointment

to

the

end by meanes

defigned,)

thole

I

fay

he

Both

Prede-

finate,

and appoint

in

thelmmutable

Purpofe

of

his

Will,to

be

conformed

unto the Image

of

his

Sonne, as

in

aflli

&ions, fo

in

Grace and

Glory;

To

fancy a fufpenfron,of

thefe Ads

of

Grace, (tome

whereof

are

Eternall)

upon conditionalls, and they

not intimated

in

the

leaf}

in

the

Text,

nor

con-

fiflent

with the

Nature

of

the things

themfeives,

or

the End intended, calling

the Accomplifhmeitt and bringing about

of

the

defignes

of

God

Propofed,

as

his,

for

our

Confolation,

upon the certaine lubricity

of

the

Wills

of

men,

and thereupon

to

propofe an intercifion

of

them,as

to their Concattenation,

and Dependance,

that

they fhould

not

have

a

certaine

Influence

on

the

one

hand,

defending

;

nor

an

Unchangeable

dependance, on

the

other

Afcending;

may

eafily

be made appeare,

to

be

fo

plaine an oppofition

to the

ayme and defigne

of

the

Apoftle,

as

tis

poflibly capable

of

But

becaufe thefe

things are really

infi[Fed

on by Mr

Goodwin.

I [hall

choofe

rather to

remove

them,

as

with much

Rhetorick,

and

not without

Tome

Sophiflry they are

by

him

preffed,

then further anticipate

them,

by arguments

of

the Text

it

felfe,

of

their invalidity and nullity.

The

difcuflion

of

our

Argument

from this place

of

Scripture, he enters up-

on Chap.

to.

se&.42.

pag.2o7. and purfues

it,

being much intangled with

what

55

ß

15.