Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  436 / 504 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 436 / 504 Next Page
Page Background

C.XV[:

Feare

of

Heil

not

the

moil

EEfeetuali

motive to Obedience.

38o one

of

them partakers

of

that

Spirit

with

whom

is

liberty, are

all

indeed

with

a

living principle

of

Grace,

Faith

and

Love, and are

conítrainedby

the

Love

ofChrift to

live

to

him, are

all

under

Grace and

not under

the,

Law

,

have

their

finnes in

fome meafure begun

to

be

mortifyed, and the

fleíh

with the

lutlsthereof, the

old man,

with

all

his wayes

and

wiles

crucifyed, by the

Death and

Croflè

ofChrift, brought with their

power

and

efficacy

by

the

Spirit

into

their

hearts,are

all delivered from

that

bondage

wherein they were

for

feare

of Deathand

Hell

all

"their

dayes, by having

Chrifi

made

Redemption

unto

them

?

I

fay

that

thefe.

perfon's

Ihould

be

molt

effe&ually

ftirred

up

to Obedience,

by

the dread

and

terrour

of

that

Iron

rod,

of

vengtance

and Hell,and

that

they fhould be

fo,

by Gods

appointment,

is

fuch

a

new,

fuch

another Gofpell,asifpreached

by an Angell from Heaven,

wefhould not

re-

ceive.

That

indeed no motive

can

be taken

from hence,

or

from

any

thing

in

the

Do&rine by Mr

Goodwin

contended for,fuited

to

the.principle

ofGofpell

Obedience

in the Saints,

that

no

fin

or lufl'whatfoever

was

ever mortifyed

by

it,that it

is

a

clog,hinderance

&

burthen to

all

Saints

as

far

as,

they

have

to

do

with it,in the

wayes

of

God,

hath

bin before demonffrated: And therefore

leaving it withal!

the

Confolation

that

-it

affords,

unto

thofe who

of

God are

given up

thereunto,

we proceed

to the

Confideration

of

another

Argument

his

eighth

in this cafe which

is

thuspropòfed

Se

&.37.

4.

5-

That

Doc`Irine

which evacuates

and

/times into iveakenefe

andfolly,all

the

gra-

cious councells

of

the

:Holy.

Ghoft

,

which

conf

ft partly in the diligent- information

which

he

gives

unto the

saints

front

place to place, concerning the

ho

fide,

cruel!

and

bloody

mind and intention

of

sathan

aping

them,

partly in detef#ing

and

making

known all

his

fubtile

firatagems,his

plots,

methoo.c,

and

dangerous

Ma-

chinations againfl

them;

partly

alfä

infurnifiing

them with fpeciall

weapons

of

all

forts,

whereby they enay;be.able

fo

grapple

with him, and

to

trptmph

over

him,

partly againe in

thofe

frequent

admonitions and Exhortations,

to

quit

themfelver

like

men

in

refi fling him, which are

found

in

the Scripture: And

laflly

in

pro-

fe

f,'ing

his

feare

leaft

sat

han

fhould circumvent

and

deceive

them,

that

DolSrine

Z

fay which

refïetisdifparagementand vanity

upon.

all

thofe

mollferious

andgraci-

one

applycationsofthe

Holy

Gbolt ,

midi

needs

be

a"Dolïritte

of

vanity

anderreur,

And

confequently

that

which

oppofeth

it

by

a

like

neceffity,

a

truth:

But

fuch

is the

common

Doarine

of

abfolute

and

infallible

-Perfeverance:

Ergo.

ss.

6.

Anf Not

to

ingage

into

any

needleffe

conteft

about

wayes

of

Arguing,

when

the

defigne

and ftrength

of

the Argument

is

evident,

I

(hall only

re-

marke two

things upon this.

Firft

the

Holy Ghoft

profeffing his feare

leaft

Sathan Ihould

beguile

Belie-

vers,

is

a

miftake.

It

was Paul

that

was fo

afraid,

not

the

Holy Ghoft,

though

he

wrote

that feare, by the appointment

and.

n-

of

the Holy Ghoft.

TheApofile

was

jealous leaft

the

Saints

Ihould by

the craft

of

Sathan

be

fedu-

ced into errours and mifcarriages;

which

yet

argues not

their

finall defe&ion,

this indeed he records

of

himfelfe ;

but

of

the

feares

of

the Holy Ghoft

arifing

from

his

uncertainty

of

thofe

iffue

of

the

things and want

of

power to prevent

the

cóming on

ofthe

things feared, I fuppofe

there

is

no mention.

And

Secondly

that the

confequent

of

the fuppolition

in

the

inference made

up-

on

it,

is

not

fo

cleare

to

me

as

to Mr

Goodwin:

via.

Snppofe

any

DoíArene

to

be

fa

fe,

whatfoever

Dol rive

islet

up

in-

.oppoftion

to

it,

is

true;

I have

kuowne and

fo

bath

Mr

Goodwin

al

fo,

when

'the truth

hath layen

be-

tween oppofite Do&rines, affaulted by

both,

entertained by neither; with

thefeObfervations

I

paflè

the

Major

of

this sillagifine

the Minor

he

thus

con

-

firmes.