Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  53 / 504 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 53 / 504 Next Page
Page Background

A

Preface

toghe

Reader.

and obtained

by general confent

the Title

of

Dodos profundur

:

Lib.

z:

de

Caufa Dei Cap. 8.

This

Profound

Learned

Do5lour

propofes this Thefts

to

be

confirmed

in

the following Chapter',

quad »ullau

viator

quantâcunq,gratiâ

creato",

fubnixuu,

folius

Arbitrii viribm

,

vel edam

cum

adjutorioGratie,paft

perfeverare frnaliter,ftne alio

'Dei

auxilie(jeciali.In

the long difputa-

tion

following he difputes out

of

the

Scriptures, and Ancient writers

abundantly

cited

to

his

purpok,

that there

is

no

palbility

of the

Perfeverance of

any

Believer in

the

faith

to

the end,upen

fetch

Helper

con

fiderations

,

and

e%ldvantages as

Mr.

Goodwin

propofeth,

as

the

only meant!

thereof That

Perfeverance

it

felfe

is

agife

of

JCod,without

which gifr,and

Grace,

none

can

per-

fevere;the and fpecialty

of

that Grace,

he

expreffeth in

the

Corollary

wherewith he clofeth

the

Chapter:

which

is,guod nullus

viator,foliw

liberi

Arbitrii,

vel

Grade

Yiribnu,aut amborumcon-

juntlim.

fine

alio

Dei

Auxilie

fpeciali,peteft perfeverare per aliquodTemples

omnino.

Further

al

letting the

efficacy

of

fpecial

grace

,

in

and for

every

good workwhatever:

His

Arguments

and Tefiimonies

I

(hall not

need

to

recite ; they are

at hand

to

thofe who dente

to

confute

them.

After the

vindication

of

the

former

The

fs,

Chap.

9.

Io.

Chap.'

t:

he

propofeth

further

this

propofitioo, to a

right undetfianding

of theDothine of

Perfeverance.

2nod

perfeveranria

non

eft

aliquod `Danum Dei

creatum,â

Charitate,& Gratiâ

realiter

differens

:

And

the

Corollary

wherewith he (huts up

that

difputation

is, quad Nomen Terfeverastice nnllam rem abfolutarp

e

f[emialiter fignificat,

fed atcidentaliter,

di

relative

;

Charitatem

videlicet,

five

jufpitiam

cum

re-

fpeílu

future

Permanfionis

ufg

in Finem ,

C'

quod

non

improbabiliter

po

fret dici

Perfeverantiatn

eh

ipfam Relátionem

bajm.

After

this

knowing wellwhatConclufron

would

eauly be inferred from these

principles,

viz

:

That

Terfeverance

i.e

net

really dif

intt

from

Faith

and Leve

,

that

it is

fuck

.e

Grace,

and

gift

of

God

that

who

ever

it's

beftowed

uponJball certainly perfevere;namely,

that

every

one who

bath

received

True

Grace,

Faith and

Love

,

shallcertainly perfevere

:

He objeFrs

that

to

him

-

felfe

,

and plainly

grants

it

to

be

fo

indeed

,

cap. 02.

And

to

make

the matter

more

cleare,

chap.

t

3:

he difputes;

that,e4uxilium

fine

qua

radius perfeverat,&

per quad

quilibet perfeverat,

eft

Spiretm

Sondes,

Divine

bonitas,c5'

voluntas. Every

Caule

of

bringing

sinful

man

to

God,

is called by

them

,

4uxilium

:

in thefe

three

,

Spiritus Sasiftw

,

Diving

Bonitos

,

tr

Voluntaç,

he

corn

prizeth the

cheíf

Caufes

of

Perfeverance ,

as

I

have alto

done

in

the

ensuing

Treatife.

By

[

Diving

Yoltontas

]

he intends

God's eternal

,

and Immutable decree,

as

he manifefis,cap.

8.9:

whither he

fends his

Reader. His,

Diving

Bonims,

is

that

free

Grace,

whereby God

ac-

cepts and justifies us

as

his. Spirtne

Sanûm

, is

Sanilification;

So

that

he affirmes

the

per

/eve-

ranee

of

the

Saints

to

toms'

in

the liability

of

their

Acceptation

with

god

,

and continuance

of

their

SanElificarion

fromhim,upon

the account

of

his

unchangeable

purpofes

and

Decrees,

which

is

the fumme

of

what

we

contend

for.

And this

is

part

of

the DoBrine

,

concerning the

Grace

of

God

, and his

foveraingty over

the

wills

of

men, which Bradwardine in his dayes cryed

out

fo

earnefily for

the

Defence

of

ro

God & man

again(' the

Pelagian

encroachement

,

which

was made

upon it

in

thofe dayes:

Thus

he

turnes himfelfe

in

the conclufion

of

his Book,

to the'Pope,and

Church of

Rome,

with

zealous earnefines for

theirInterpolation,

to the Determination

of

there Controverfyes

:

ut

or

iniquè loguentium(

faith

he)

obftrnatur,

frexie genibus

cordes

nei

imploro

Ecclefiam

,

pracipsse

Rcmanam,

qua fummâ

eflurboritatevigeredignofcitur

,

guaranis

ipfa determinare

dignetur, quid

circa

Pr

emi

f

fas

Catholics

fit tenendum.

Non

cramfine

periculo in

talibm

erratur.

Simon

der-

mis

3

exnrge

(

fpeaking

to

the

Pope)

eximegladium

,

amputa

quaff

finiftra haretica

pravitatis,'

defende, Cr protege

Catholicam

veritatem.

Torrò

etfi

Dominus

ipfe

in

Petri

navicula darmiat, ni-

mietateTempeftatás

compulfm,

ipf

um

gm4,fiducialiterexcitabo,quateneuSpiritua

oris

Jeri

Tempe-

flarefedatâ

tranguillum facial

&

ferenum. Ab

fit

autem,ur qui in prorâ bujui

Navicule

pervigil

laborabat,jam

in poppi

fuper cervicali darmiat, vel dormitet.Lib.

3.

Cap.

g

3.

With

this earnefinels above 300 years

agoe

did this

profoundly

learned man

press

the

Popes

to

a

determination

of

thefe

Controverfyes, againfl the Telagians,and

their

Succeffours in

his

Schooles.

The

fame fuit

bath

ever since

beencontinued

by very

many Learned

men,(in

every

Age,)of the

communion

of

theChurch of

Rome,crying

out

for the 'Papal definitive Sentence

againft the

Pelagian

errours crept

intotheir

Church

;

efpecially

bath

this

out

-cry

withfuppli-

caton

been

renewed by

rheDominican

fryars,ever

lince the

7efuites

have

fo

cunningly guilded

over

thatTelegian Poyfon,&

let

it

ouc,as

the bell,

&

moli wholfome

food

for

the

HolyMo-

ther

,

and her children.

Yea

with

fetch

earnefines bath thisbeen in

the

loft Age

purfued,

by

Agents

in

the

Court

of

Rowe:that

(a

Congregation

de

Auxiliia being purpofely

appointed)rt

was generallyfuppofed one

while,

that

theywould have prevailed

intheir

fuit,

and

have

ob-

F

3

tamed