Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  327 / 674 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 327 / 674 Next Page
Page Background

SECT.

IV.}

PROOF

OF

A

SEPARATE-

STATE.

3O7

some good

assurance on the

contrary

side.

He must

be

a

shrewd

philosopher, indeed,

who,

upon

any

other

hypothesis, can

give

a

tolerable account

of

all

the

narra-.

fives

in

Glanvill's

"

Sadducismus

triumphatus," or Bax-

ter's

"

World

of

Spirits

and Apparitions,"

&c.

Though

I

will

grant

some

of

these stories

have

but

insufficient

proof,

yet

if

there

be

but

one

real apparition

of

a

de-

parted

spirit,

then

the

point

is

gained,

that

there

is

a

separate

state.

And,

indeed, the

scripture itself

seems

to

mention

such

sort

of

ghosts,

or appearances

of

souls

departed;

Matt.

xiv. 26.

When

the disciples

saw

Jesus

walking

on

the

water, they

"

thought it had

been a

spirit;"

And

Luke

xxiv.

37.

after

his

resurrection they

saw

him;

at

once,

appearing

in

the midst

of

them,

"

and they

supposed they had

seen

a spirit

;

and

our

Saviour

doth not

contradict their

notion,

but

argues

with

them

upon

the

supposition

of

the

truth of

it,

a

spirit

bath

not

flesh

and bones

as ye see me to have."

And,

Acts

xxiii.

8,

9.

the word

"

spirit"

seems to signify the

"

ap-

parition of a

departed

soul," where

it

is

said,

"

The

sadducees

say,

there

is

no

resurrection, neither

angel,

nor

spirit,"

and,

verse

9.

"

If

a

spirit,

or

an angel

bath

spoken

to

this

man,"

&c.

A spirit here

is

plainly dis-

tinct

from

an

angel, and

what can it

mean

but

an

appa

--

sition

of a

human

soul which has

left the

body

?

SECTION

IV.

Objections answered.

HAVING

pointed out

so

many springs

of

argument,

to

support

this

doctrine

from

the

word

of

God,

as well as

from

reason and tradition,

.I

proceed

now

to

answer some

particular

objections,

which

are

raised

against

it.

Objection

I.

The scripture

is so

far

from

supposing,

that

the

soul

of

man

is

immortal,

or

that

there

is

any such

thing

as

the

life

of

the

soul

continuing after the death

of

the

body,

that

it often speaks

of

the

death

of

the

soul,

if

the words were

translated

exactly according to the origi-

nal. Numb. xxxi.

19.

"

Whosoever

bath. killed

any

person," hebrew" any

soul.

1

Sam.

xxii.

22:-

"

I

have

occasioned the

death

of

every soul of thy father's house."

Judges

xvi.

30.

"

And Sampson

said,

let

my

soul die

x

,