Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  60 / 674 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 60 / 674 Next Page
Page Background

40

THE UNIVERSAL RULE

OF

.EQUITY.

(SEAM.

*

XXIII.

I. What

is

the

true

meaning

of

this divine rule.

II.

What

is

the special

argument

that our

Lord uses

in

order

to

enforce

it.

I,II..

Wherein

the

particular

excellencies

of

it

appear.

IV.

I

shall conclude

with' some reflections on this

sub-

ject.

First,

What

is

the

true meaning

of

this

rule

?

In

order

to

understand

this

rule aright,

we

must

consi-,

der

what

it

does

not

require,

as

well as

what

it

does

ì

For

on the one

side,

some

selfish

necessitous

and unreason-

able persons

may

expect more

from

us

than

this

rule

obliges

us

to perform :.

And

on

the

other

side,

a timor-

ous and

weak

conscience

may

perhaps

be

led

into a

mis-

take,

and think itself bound

by

this

rule

to perform some

instances of

kindness

to

others,

which

are'trtterly unrea-

sonable and unrequired, and

which

might

be

injurious

on

other

accounts

to ourselves,

or

to

our

families,

or to

the

rest

of

mankind.

We must remember

then,

that

this rule does

not

mean

to

oblige

us to give

all

that

to

another, or

do all

that

for

another,

which

we

could possibly desire or

wish

to be

bestowed upon

us,

or done

for

us; but whatsoever we

could

reasonably

desire,

and justly expect

another

should

do

to

us,

that

'we

ought

to do to

him when he

is

in

the

like circumstances.

All

that

in our calm

and sedate

thoughts

we

judge,

fit

and

proper another

should do for

us,

that

we

should practise and

do

for

him. Such

re-

quests

as

we

could make

to

others, and could

justify

-them

to

ourselves

in

our

own consciences,

according to

the

principles

of

humanity, the rules

of civil

society,

and.

the

rights

of

mankind,

such

we

ought not

to

deny to

others when

they stand

in

need.

Not

all

that

a fond

self

-love would

prompt

us

to

ask,

but

all

that our

con-

science tell

us we

might with reason expect.

I

shall

mention an instance or

two,

which

will

more

fully

explain what

I

mean.

4

criminal under righteous condemnation

for

murder

or

robbery, may think thus with

himself,

"

Surely

I

would

pardon

the

judge

or.

the prince,

if

he

were in.my

circum-

stances, therefore

he

ought

to

pardon

me."

Or

the

judge

himself

might ;think, "

I

should

be glad to

be

pardoned

or

not condemned,

if

I

were in

the

case

of

this

criminal,

therefore I

will

not

condemn

him."

This sort

of

thoughts