Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  282 / 514 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 282 / 514 Next Page
Page Background

274

L

RATIONAL DEFENCE

OF

THE COSPEL.

ESERM..

XV!,

know

little of

the

religion

of

Christ,.

or

of the

sacred

name into

which they were baptized.

Now

that

we

may

act

and speak

as becomes

persons

endued

with reason;

I

thought it

necessary

at

first

to

give

some

account

what

this gospel

is,

that

you,

might

know

and

understand the

religion

which you

profess

;

and if

'ye

will

glory in

the

name

of

Christian, ye may be

able

to

tell

what

it

is

you

mean

by

christianity.

By

reading the

books

of

the

New Testament, wherein

the

gospel

is

contained,

you

will find

this to

be the

sum

and substance

of

it, viz.

that

it

is

a.

wise,-

a-

holy,

and

a

gracious constitution

of God

for

the

recovery

of

sinful

man,

by

sending

his own Son

Jesus

Christ

into the

flesh,

to obey

his

law which

man had

broke

-n,

to make a

proper

atonement

for

sin

by

his

death;

and

thus

to

procure the

favour

of

Grid,

and

eternal

happiness, for

all

that

be-

lieve

and repent, and

receive this offered

salvation; to-

gether

with

a

promise

of

the holy

Spirit

to work this

faith

and

repentance

in

their

hearts,.

to renew

their

sinful

natures unto

holiness, to form them on

earth

fit

for

this

happiness,

and

to bring them to the

full possession

of

it

in

heaven.

J

have

shewn, in

the next

place,

what

St.

Paul

meant,

when

he told

the Romans

he was

not

ashamed

of

this

gospel

:

He

was

neither

ashamed to

believe

it

as a man,

nor

to profess

it

as a

christian,

nor

to

preach

it

to

others

as a

minister,

nor

to defend

it

as

a

good soldier

of

Christ,

nor

to suffer

and

die for

it

as

a martyr.

The third

thing which

I

proposed,

was

to make

it

ap

pear,

that

all

the occasions

of

shame, which

men,

of

in-

fidelity

pretend' to raise

from this gospel, may be

an-

swered

upon the fair

and

just

principles

of

reason and

argument.

The

first

sort of reproaches

are these

which

are

cast upon the doctrines

of

the

gospel,

and

I

hope

I

have

rolled

them away.

I

repeat

no

more

of

these things,

but

proceed

to

the

next sort

of

Occasions

of

shame, and these

are

such as

are

supposed to arise

froni

the professors

of

this

gospel;

and

I

shall

endeavour

to

shed-

you also

how

they may be

answered.

They are

chiefly_

these

four:

I.

Some

will

say,

"

The

professors

of

this gospel in

the

beginning

were

the

weak,

and

foolish,

and mean

things

of

this world

;

but

it

was

despised

by

the

wise,

it