Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  23 / 652 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 23 / 652 Next Page
Page Background

SERIA.

I.1

NATURAL

RELIGION,

ITS

USES AND

DEFECTS.

13

want of

a better

guide

than their

own

reasonings

?

and

how generally,

and

almost

without exception,

did

their

philosophers comply with the

idolatry

of

their country,

and

worshipped

God

in

the form

of

beasts

and

birds,

and

creeping

things,

and changed the

truth of God

into

a

lie;

or the

true God

into false

and shameful

images;

Rom.

i.

23, 25.

Sometimes

appetite

and passion, pride

and

:humour

spread

a

mist

over

the

understanding

of

the

heathens;

sometimes the customs

and traditions

of

their nation,

the authority

of

their

ancestors,

or

their philosophers,

or

their

own

vile prejudices,

of

various

kinds

gave

them

a

false

clue,

and

set

them,

a

running-

upon

.a wrong

scent

:

In other

places,

the tyranny

of

their

princes,

and

the

folly

and superstitious

madness

of

their priests,

either

led,

or drove

them

far

away

from the

truth.

What

shameful

vices

were

authorised

by

some

of

their

great

men

?

Theft,

in some

places,

was

commended as a

feat

of

dexterity,

and

revenge

as a

point

of

honour

while

public

robberies

of

nations

were

the

glory

of their

heroes.

The

murder

and ravage

of

whole'

countries,

were allowed

for the enlargement

of

their dominions,

and the

blood

of

kingdoms

was

made

an

offering to

the

ambition

of

neighbour

-

kings.

In

some

countries,

the

youth

and

flower

of

conquered nations

were

doomed

'a

sacrifice

to

their

idols;

and sometimes

filthy

and abominable lewd-

ness

were the ceremonies

of their worship. -flow

blind,

was

the

eye

of

their

reason,

not

to

see

this

madness?

And

how

feeble its

power,

that

it made no

remonstrances

against

these

lewd

and

bloodyscenes

ofpretended

piety?

All

these instances indeed do

not

effectually prove,

that

reason could

not

possibly

teach them

better; but

the experience of

long

ages,

and

of

whole

nations,

suf-

ficiently

shew

us,'

that

their reason neither did inform

them

better, nor

was

ever

likely

to

do

it.

Even the

best

of

the philosophers could

give

us"

but

a

sorry

system

of

religion

compared

with

our.

bible

;

so

that

St.

Paul

roundly

expresses

it;

1

Cor.

i.

2l. "The.

world

by

wis-

dom knew

not God."

3.

`

All the knowledge

of

God

which

they

arrived

at,

by,the,

light

of

nature, had

actually

but little

influence

to reform the hearts,

or

the

lives

of

mankind." I

say,

it

had but little

influence in

comparison of what it

might,