Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  101 / 652 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 101 / 652 Next Page
Page Background

SERM.

VI.i

THE LORDS

-DAY,

OR

CHRISTIAN

SABBATH.

91

or threatening calamities, or

to do good

to

the

miserable

or

to

the helpless ?"

&c.

I

answer,

Answer.

That

works

of

necessity and

of

mercy

were

not

excluded

on

th'is,dav, even

under

the

rigors

of

Juda-

ism,

where rest

seems to be

the primary or most obvious

design

of

the

sabbath

;

and

much

less

should these

ne-

cessary

and

merciful works

be

excluded

in

the

christian

dispensation,

where the

chief

design

is

not

bodily

rest

but worship

;

such works,

I

mean,

as

leading cattle to

drink, giving them

fodder, sailing

a ship,

quenching

a

fire,

stopping inundations

of

water,

defending

a

town

or

city

that

is

invaded

by

enemies, resisting an assault,

raising cattle

out of a

pat

whereinto they

are

fallen,

re-

lieving the distressed,

nursing the

sick,

and taking care

of

children.

In

short,

there

is

nothing

of

this kind

for

-

bidden, even

though it

may, in

a

great

measure, some-

times

hinder

the

proper

work

of

the

day,

which

is

religion

and

worship;

for God

will

have mercy and

not sacri-

fice ;"

Mat.

xii.

1

-7.

" Jesus

healed the

sick on

the

sabbath

;"

verses

10

-13.

and

his

"

disciples

rubbed out

the

corn from

the ears

when

they were hungry

;"

Mark

ii.

23

-28.

and

though

the

Pharisees reproved

them,

yet

the Lord pronounced

them blameless.

"

The sabbath

was

made for

man,

and not

man for the

sabbath

;"

Luke

vi.

1

-11.

John

v.

8,

9.

Even

the infirm

man

who was

healed,

was ordered

by

our

Saviour "

to

take

up

his

bed

and

walk,"

verses

10

-12,

as

a

proof of

his

cure.

The

Son

of

God

is

Lord

of

the

sabbath

;"

Mark

ii.

27,

28.

and

he still

more abates the severities

of it

when

the

Jew-

ish

dispensation

is

finished.

Under

the New

Testament

we

have

no such

strict

and

severe

prohibitions of

every

care and

labour

in

the

common

returns of

the

Lord's

-day,

where they do

not

interfere

with

the

primary

design

of

it,

that

is,

the wor-

ship

of

God and our best improvement thereby.

As

I

would

not

bind

new

burthens

on

the servants

of

Christ,

so

neither

would

I

release what

Christ

has bound. And

therefore

I

say,

where

the necessary

labours

of

a

few

in

some

part

of

the Lord's

-day, by

providing

food

and

other

conveniences

of

life,

render

many more persons

capable

of

spending

the

day

in

religion,

I

cannot

find

that

the

New Testament forbids

it.

I

say,

in some

part of

the

Lord's -day,

for

I

think none ought

to

be so

constantly