Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  334 / 652 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 334 / 652 Next Page
Page Background

324

THE

POWERS AND

CONTESTS

OP

FLESH

AND

SPIRIT.

If

the

eye

beholds

food,

,though the man

be

assured

there

is

hidden

poison in

,it,

yet the hungry stomach

will

have

a

nati.

1

appetite

toward

it,

and

this

is

not

sinful

;

but

if

the soul comply, and the man

eat

it,

or desire

to

eat

it, he

breaks the sixth command,

which

forbids

all

Murder.

Our

Saviour

has sufficiently

decided

this

part

of

the controversy

in his

sermon

on

the

mount,

that

the

soul's very desire

and

consent, to

sin

is

sinful

?

]Wat.

v.

97. And

the fuller and stronger the consent

of

the

will

is,

and the

further

it

goes

on

to

encourage

or

impel

the

body

to

the forbidden action,

so

much

greater

is

the

sin.

When our

blessed

Saviour spake these

words:

"

he

that

looketh upon a

woman, to

lust after

her,

bath

com-

mitted adultery already

in

his

heart

;"

flat.

v.

28.

it

can

-.

not

be

supposed

that

lie

intended to

give a law

that

should

make the inward motions

or

ferments of' mere animal

nature

sinful

;

for these were

not

originally

and naturally

subject

to

the immediate command of the

soul in

the

state of

innocency,

so

as to be

raised or prevented abso-

lutely

and immediately

by

the

will,

as the

motion

of

the

hand

or

foot.is.

But

his

design

is

to shew,

that

the

soul

itself

inwardly consenting to these animal ferments and

motions, or encouraging or indulging them

but

one mo-

ment,

is

really,

sinful in

the sight

of

God,

even

though

the

man

did

never

proceed

to

the outward

and actual

commission

of

those

sins in

the

flesh

:

And hereby

he

vindicated

the

l:zw

of

God

from those

narrow and

cor-

rupt

expositions which' the

scribes,

and doctors,

and

interpreters of

those

days,

put upon

it,

who would allow

nothing

to

be

sinful

but

the

outward

act.

This

will

appear

with

fuller

evidence,

if

we

consider

that

there

might

be

in

the

flesh

of innocent

Adam,

some

natural

appetites

toward objects

that

might

be forbidden

by the express

and

positive

law

of God

;

for

the

flesh,

merely considered

in itself,

has

a

natural

propensity,

to

things

that

please

and

gratify

it,

without

any

regard

to

the

unseen

circumstances or moral relations

of

things

;

without

any

respect

to a law

that

permits or prohibits

them.

Thus

Adam, or

his

partner,

might

feel an

inno-

cent inclination

in

their animal natures, towards

any

fruit

in the

garden

that

was

pleasant

to

the

eyes,

and

good

for

food, even

to

that.

of the

tree

of

knowledge

:

And

this